Re: win32 socket definition

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: win32 socket definition
Date: 2010-01-06 22:21:27
Message-ID: 27767.1262816487@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 23:17, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> BTW, I trust the non-windows case should be "int".

> Haha, yeah, that was my attempt at producing a warning. Which didn't work :-)

Hmm ... "char *" would provoke warnings, but only in the places that
were using the new definition, which is not what you need to find.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-01-06 22:24:06 Re: Testing with concurrent sessions
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-01-06 22:18:27 Re: win32 socket definition