Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-22 14:47:37
Message-ID: 2772.1240411657@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Still, my original proposal was \df[antw][S+]. The extra brackets are
> obviously redundant, but if we're about providing cues, this is a good
> cue IMO. It allows the [S+] to match the other lines.

I'm for that too. Bruce was complaining that it'd make the column
wider, but I don't find that a compelling objection.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-04-22 15:00:16 Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-22 14:44:15 Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df