| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, Tino Wildenhain <tino(at)wildenhain(dot)de>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andre Truter <linux(at)trusoft(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Subject: | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
| Date: | 2006-01-03 23:56:37 |
| Message-ID: | 27674.1136332597@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-general |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
>> Makefiles don't install them either.
>>
>> It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
>> to be --- do we need to create subdirectories under {prefix}/doc to
>> forestall name conflicts?
> While I'm messing with dblink, did you want me to do anything WRT this?
I don't think we settled on what we want to do yet. Any thoughts?
I'm kind of leaning toward the subdirectory idea myself...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-01-04 00:20:38 | Supplemental contrib docs (was: [GENERAL] DBlink documentation) |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-01-03 23:52:24 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2006-01-04 00:20:38 | Supplemental contrib docs (was: [GENERAL] DBlink documentation) |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-01-03 23:52:24 | Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Re: DBlink documentation |