Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance
Date: 2005-10-22 02:45:48
Message-ID: 27603.1129949148@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Heads up - I have seen 2 regression hangs. I am checking further. Has
> anyone else run the regression suite with any version of this patch?

Hm, anyone else? It's pretty hard to see how the patch could break
the regression tests, because they don't exercise control-C response
time.

Andrew, did you do a full rebuild after applying the patch? I don't
quite see why that would be needed either, but people have seen weird
failures from partial rebuilds before ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Buchanan 2005-10-22 03:28:16 Re: RSS feeds of CVS revision logs
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-10-22 02:20:01 Re: [PATCHES] Win32 CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() performance