Re: RC1?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RC1?
Date: 2002-11-14 05:17:40
Message-ID: 27536.1037251060@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> How shall we distinguish your version of freebsd from the ones that
>> need the other comparison file?

> He is using the FreeBSD 3.x series (which is quite old now), whereas most
> people are probably using 4.x. I have no problems with regression tests on
> 4.x so perhaps it's something that changed??

How do you feel about resultmap entries

float8/i.86-.*-freebsd3=float8-fp-exception
float8/i.86-.*-freebsd4=float8-small-is-zero

to replace the existing

float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero

Are there (now or in the foreseeable future) freebsd major versions > 4?
We could do

float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[4-9]=float8-small-is-zero

which might or might not be more future-proof.

> Actually, I've only tested FreeBSD/alpha 4.x - perhaps I should test intel
> as well.

<blink> ain't none of the float8 bsd resultmap entries will match alpha...
so you must be matching the default version?

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: RC1? at 2002-11-14 03:30:30 from Christopher Kings-Lynne

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-11-14 05:24:06 Re: An article mentioning PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-14 05:04:43 Re: An article mentioning PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2002-11-14 05:43:32 Re: RC1?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-14 05:02:43 Re: RC1?