Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Date: 2006-09-14 12:41:51
Message-ID: 27509.1158237711@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Anyway, given that there's this one nonobvious gotcha, there might be
>> others. My recommendation is that we take this off the open-items list
>> for 8.2 and revisit it in the 8.3 cycle when there's more time.

> I wonder if Theo's recent reported problem with 4.3M child xids changes the
> calculus on this.

Yeah, I was just looking at that. Removing useless entries from the
child-xid list would presumably help him. Considering we're not even
formally in beta yet, I'm probably being too conservative to recommend
we not touch it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-14 12:51:39 Re: Vacuum error on database postgres
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-14 12:19:59 Re: Interesting tight loop

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-14 13:40:50 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-09-14 11:05:52 Re: CSStorm occurred again by postgreSQL8.2