| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-11 02:47:34 |
| Message-ID: | 27450.1207882054@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> If you have something to add, please do so at some time, but if you are not
> interested in using a tracker anyway, just don't use it and ignore this
> thread.
Hmm, well, I can hardly see how anyone could object to a tracker that
they didn't have to use --- that is, one that hadn't been declared to be
the new center of our development process. The push-back that you're
seeing is because just about every proposal for such a tracker has
included somewhere along the line the notion that the email lists will
stop being the primary reference. Making that happen will require
obtaining general consensus, not just telling objectors to go away.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-04-11 02:50:53 | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2008-04-11 02:38:19 | Re: Commit fest queue |