Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2
Date: 2001-04-20 18:51:23
Message-ID: 27414.987792683@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Remember one idea is for index scans to automatically update the expired
> flag in the index bitfields when they check the heap tuple.

There is no such flag, and I'm not planning to add one before I fix
statistics ;-)

There are a number of things that'd have to be thought about before
such a thing could happen. For one thing, trying to obtain write locks
instead of read locks during a btree scan would blow us out of the water
for supporting concurrent btree operations.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-20 18:52:28 Re: [HACKERS] Hardcopy docs available
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-04-20 18:40:37 Re: RFC: planner statistics in 7.2