| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | "Vince Vielhaber" <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, "Katie Ward" <kward(at)peerdirect(dot)com>, "Curtis Faith" <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Date: | 2003-01-29 17:11:54 |
| Message-ID: | 27383.1043860314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> Aside from load testing as suggested by Vince, I'd be
>> interested to hear what happens when you pull the power cord
>> under load (repeatedly). This would give some evidence about
>> the robustness of the Windows filesystem and its ability to
>> emulate Unix sync semantics.
> OK, I can maybe do some testing on that next week (I'm off for a few
> days from today). Is there anything in particular I should look out for,
> or that you would want tested?
Make sure your test load includes lots of updating queries, and look for
database corruption --- bad data, duplicated rows, lost rows, that sort
of thing.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2003-01-29 17:12:34 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2003-01-29 17:09:44 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |