Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
Cc: Adrian Maier <adrian(dot)maier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: float8 regression failure (HEAD, cygwin)
Date: 2006-07-20 14:54:44
Message-ID: 27320.1153407284@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at> writes:
> BTW: HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 is defined, so INT64_IS_BUSTED is defined also.

You sure? INT64_IS_BUSTED should *not* be set in that case --- it's
only supposed to be set if we couldn't find any 64-bit-int type at all.

As for the regression test failure, it's odd because it looks to me that
the actual test output is an exact match to the default "float8.out"
file. I'm not sure why pg_regress chose to report a diff against
float8-small-is-zero.out instead. This may be another teething pain
of the new pg_regress-in-C code --- could you trace through it and see
what's happening?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-07-20 15:24:01 Re: pg_regress breaks on msys
Previous Message David Fetter 2006-07-20 14:44:08 Re: Units in postgresql.conf

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Saito 2006-07-20 15:24:01 Re: pg_regress breaks on msys
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-07-20 14:32:47 Re: pg_regress breaks on msys