Re: 8.2 beta blockers

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 8.2 beta blockers
Date: 2006-09-18 14:10:32
Message-ID: 27291.1158588632@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jimn(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> One problem I see with userlock is that you're asking for lock ID
> conflicts unless you control everything on the system that's using
> userlocks.

Well, the lock IDs already include the database OID under the hood,
so you only need to control stuff within your database. Beyond that,
yeah, it's your responsibility...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-09-18 14:30:31 Re: new language translation (.po)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-18 14:05:14 Re: Reducing data type space usage