| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_terminate_backend idea |
| Date: | 2005-06-22 13:54:08 |
| Message-ID: | 27105.1119448448@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> In any case the correct way to solve the problem is to find
>> out what's being left corrupt by SIGTERM, rather than install
>> more messiness in order to avoid facing the real issue ...
> That is unfortunatly way over my head. And it doesn't seem like anybody
> who actually has what it takes to do the "proper solution" is interested
> in doing it.
A test case --- even one that fails only a small percentage of the time
--- would make things far easier. So far all I've seen are very vague
reports, and it's impossible to do anything about it without more info.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-22 14:01:04 | Re: pg_terminate_backend idea |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-06-22 11:25:57 | Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity |