Re: parallel regression test failure

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: parallel regression test failure
Date: 2003-07-31 02:49:25
Message-ID: 26962.1059619765@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers

"Mendola Gaetano" <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com> writes:
> "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> We need to think about whether this bug is serious enough to justify a
>>> quick 7.3.5 release. I'm leaning to the idea that it is not, because
>>> if it were, we'd have heard about it from the field before now. In
>>> pre-7.4 code there is only one instant in the lifespan of an index where
>>> the bug could occur, and then only if the index is created empty.
>>
>> Agreed, I don't think 7.3.5 is warranted, but it would have been nice to
>> get this in 7.3.4. Let's keep our eyes open for maybe a 7.3.5 later.

> 7.3.4 is already out, I agree that do a 7.3.5 build is not necessary.

I dug back in the archives and convinced myself that this bug existed as
far back as Postgres 4.2 (nbtsearch.c dated 1994-02-07); it's probably
much older but I have nothing to look at to check. Since it's managed
to go undetected for a decade, it's probably not a "must fix today!"
kind of bug.

I do think we ought to put out a 7.3.5 that includes the fix at some
point, but let's wait a few weeks and see if anything else turns up
to include.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John P. Looney 2003-07-31 08:21:31 Re: Postgres db corrupted ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-31 00:48:39 Re: Script to recreate indexes?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-31 04:02:16 Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-31 02:33:55 Re: Error messages --- now that we've got it, do you like