| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, marko(dot)tiikkaja(at)cs(dot)helsinki(dot)fi, depesz(at)depesz(dot)com, magnus(at)hagander(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |
| Date: | 2011-01-21 02:29:50 |
| Message-ID: | 26883.1295576990@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>> Oh, you mean water that had some things you didn't want taken out
>> of it?
> Right -- God only knows the number of things were filtered out to
> leave me with filtered water. What's "filtered" in this case is what
> was passed through, not what was removed.
I think it's pretty common to use the phrase "filtered out" to identify
the stuff that gets removed by the filter, as opposed to what gets
through. So we could possibly use "Rows Filtered Out: nnn". I still
think that's more awkward than "Rows Removed: nnn" though.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-21 02:32:48 | Re: SSI and Hot Standby |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-21 02:24:44 | Re: REVIEW: EXPLAIN and nfiltered |