Re: semaphore usage "port based"?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, freebsd-stable(at)freebsd(dot)org, Kris Kennaway <kris(at)obsecurity(dot)org>
Subject: Re: semaphore usage "port based"?
Date: 2006-04-03 01:34:54
Message-ID: 26796.1144028094@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> OK, could we see strace (or whatever BSD calls it) output for the second
>> postmaster? I'd like to see exactly what results it's getting for the
>> kernel calls it makes during IpcSemaphoreCreate.

> 'k, dont' know what strace is ... we have ktrace and truss ... truss is
> what I usually use, and is:

truss seems to have an output format closer to what I'm used to, but
either will do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2006-04-03 01:43:40 Re: WAL Bypass for indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-04-03 01:32:13 Re: WAL Bypass for indexes