| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <ams(at)oryx(dot)com>, <plperlng-devel(at)pgfoundry(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: return_next for plperl (was Re: call for help) |
| Date: | 2005-06-04 22:27:10 |
| Message-ID: | 26731.203.26.206.129.1117924030.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian said:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>>
>> This has broken the regression tests for plperl - see for example
>>
>>
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=panda&dt=2005-06-04%2021:20:01>> That's because, as Abhijit noted in point 4 below, select foo_srf() no
>> longer works.
>>
>> At a minimum those calls need to be removed from the regression tests.
>>
>> See also my later comments in response to Neil's request of a few days
>> ago. In particular, I would very much like the callback function
>> renamed to a simple "return_next".
>
> OK, would you please submit a patch to fix it. Thanks.
>
I will unless someone beats me to it in the next 2 weeks - I am currently
travelling and don't really have development facilities available.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-06-04 22:52:31 | Re: ARRAY() returning NULL instead of ARRAY[] resp. {} |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-06-04 22:07:33 | Re: AllocSetReset improvement |