Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PGSQL-Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port
Date: 2007-01-06 04:57:53
Message-ID: 26608.1168059473@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 1/6/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Yes, because it can be more than one hostname.

> But the code in postmaster.c expects the list to be comma separated.

Sure, but SplitIdentifierString allows for whitespace, eg

'host1, host2, host3'

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-01-06 05:02:32 Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2007-01-06 04:48:45 Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-01-06 11:52:01 Re: Updated XML patch
Previous Message Gurjeet Singh 2007-01-06 04:48:45 Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port