| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Jacobs <jacobs(at)penguin(dot)theopalgroup(dot)com>, joconnor(at)cybermesa(dot)com, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PlPython |
| Date: | 2003-06-26 16:59:14 |
| Message-ID: | 26428.1056646754@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
DeJuan Jackson <djackson(at)speedfc(dot)com> writes:
> Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it
> need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.
Now that the rexec code is gone, it MUST be marked untrusted --- this is
not a question for debate. Installing it as trusted would be a security
hole.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-26 17:03:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-26 16:50:36 | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-26 17:03:48 | Re: [GENERAL] Physical Database Configuration |
| Previous Message | Thomas Swan | 2003-06-26 16:51:32 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |