Re: selective fsync?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: selective fsync?
Date: 2000-10-16 16:25:49
Message-ID: 26336.971713549@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

WAL should supersede all these concerns about fsync. At the very least,
it changes the tradeoffs enough that there's no point in designing
performance improvements based on the old code...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2000-10-16 16:29:58 Re: Re: New relkind for views
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2000-10-16 16:23:52 Ответ: [HACKERS] New file naming