Re: O_NOATIME

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: O_NOATIME
Date: 2006-08-03 21:06:28
Message-ID: 26312.1154639188@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't that usually, and more portably, handled in the filesystem
>> mount options?

> Yes to both. I could imagine that for small systems/workstations
> you might have some files that want access time, and others that
> wanted NOATIME -- it seems the new flag lets you choose on a
> file-by-file bases.

Personally, if I were an admin who wanted access times, I'd regard
the existence of such a flag as a security hole.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 21:14:36 Re: tg_trigtuple/tg_newtuple settings in AFTER triggers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-03 21:04:47 Re: User-defined typle similar to char(length) varchar(length)