Re: Constraints & pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Constraints & pg_dump
Date: 2004-03-17 17:41:48
Message-ID: 26312.1079545308@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> Oh, why didn't you say so? Seems like the correct tool to solve that is
>> a partial unique index, not a constraint at all.

> Hmmm .... we support that? Darn, how do I miss these things. When did we
> start supporting it? Bric still has a lot of users who use 7.2.

Looks like it was added (back) in 7.2.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-17 17:58:34 Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-17 17:36:35 Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks