| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq compression |
| Date: | 2012-06-17 15:42:18 |
| Message-ID: | 26283.1339947738@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Is there a reason why we don't have a parameter on the client
> mirroring ssl_ciphers?
Dunno, do we need one? I am not sure what the cipher negotiation process
looks like or which side has the freedom to choose.
> That, or just have DEFAULT as being the default (which in current
> openssl means ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL.
If our default isn't the same as the underlying default, I have to
question why not. But are you sure this "!" notation will work with
all openssl versions?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2012-06-17 15:45:54 | Re: libpq compression |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-17 15:38:10 | Re: Broken system timekeeping breaks the stats collector |