Re: string function - "format" function proposal

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Date: 2010-09-06 13:47:55
Message-ID: 26221.1283780875@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> 2010/9/6 Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> Which should we use for such purposes? Consistent behavior is
>> obviously preferred. Boolean type might be the only type that
>> is converted to different representation in typoutput or cast-to-test,
>> but we should consider to have boolean-specific hardwired code,
>> or cast all types to text instead of output functions.

> Personally I prefer casting to text -

No, you need to use the I/O functions. Not every type is guaranteed to
have a cast to text.

> iit allows some later
> customizations. And it's more consistent with || operator.

I don't buy either of those arguments.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-06 13:52:26 Re: git: uh-oh
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-09-06 13:37:31 Re: git: uh-oh