Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-10-20 14:31:41
Message-ID: 26138.1287585101@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr> wrote:
>> In v6 patch, should client_min_messages or log_min_messages be lower
>> than WARNING, they get set to WARNING for the script install context. We
>> still dump the extension's script at each WARNING, but you can set your
>> client_min_messages (and log_min_messages) to ERROR before hand.

> I would vote for overriding client_min_messages but not log_min_messages.

Why? The problem with unreasonably bulky messages is just as
objectionable for the log.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2010-10-20 14:32:01 Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby
Previous Message Robert Treat 2010-10-20 14:29:19 Re: Simplifying replication