Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers.
Date: 2000-01-24 18:20:04
Message-ID: 26041.948738004@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> This morning I cvs'd made, installed, moved data->data2, initdb, started
> up postmaster, reloaded data (this worked!), then tried the join. It's a
> big one, so I thought I might as well stress it at the same time, and did
> a regression test.

> Anything I could try to narrow the problem down?

Hmm. Why don't you try running the parallel regression test, to see
if that blows up too?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-24 18:30:21 Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns
Previous Message Peter Mount 2000-01-24 18:18:24 Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver