Re: .conf File Organization

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: .conf File Organization
Date: 2007-06-12 19:51:46
Message-ID: 26035.1181677906@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On the more hypothetical basis I was thinking of adding a section at the top
> with the 7-9 most common options that people *need* to set; this would make
> PostgreSQL.conf much more accessable but would result in duplicate options
> which might cause some issues.

Doesn't sound like a good idea, but maybe there's a case for a comment
there saying "these are the most important ones to look at"?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-06-12 20:04:13 Re: [HACKERS] Avoiding legal email signatures
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-06-12 19:49:06 Re: .conf File Organization

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-06-12 20:08:01 Re: .conf File Organization
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-06-12 19:49:06 Re: .conf File Organization