Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com, devrim(at)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr, mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working
Date: 2005-12-06 05:29:33
Message-ID: 25983.1133846973@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> If we don't do this then we need to link snprintf into libpgtypes just
> like we do for ecpg, but it seems like overkill.

It might be overkill today, but what about tomorrow when someone decides
to internationalize libpgtypes? I made it link in there too. Please
test ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2005-12-06 05:35:43 Re: Replication on the backend
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-06 05:19:35 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2005-12-06 05:51:12 Re: Reduce NUMERIC size by 2 bytes, reduce max length to 508
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-06 05:19:35 Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working