Re: recursive SQL functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: recursive SQL functions
Date: 2002-02-23 19:23:39
Message-ID: 25832.1014492219@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> ISTM that this is already what's happening. Each level gets a new plan
> tree.

Fine then. I wasn't sure if that'd fall out of the existing behavior
or not...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-02-23 19:26:39 Re: elog() proposal
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2002-02-23 19:08:24 Re: recursive SQL functions