| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Sampling Profler for Postgres |
| Date: | 2009-03-10 12:04:35 |
| Message-ID: | 25823.1236686675@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 21:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I'm not at all convinced that we should be putting effort into a
>> homegrown, partial substitute for DTrace.
> I was, but I'm not anymore.
> Do you think we will be able to enable this in builds for 8.4?
The bugzilla entry I pointed to was asking me to enable it for 8.3.
Which I did. It's certainly got some rough edges today, but I fully
expect it to be usable when Fedora 11 ships.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-10 12:35:17 | Re: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1704) |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-03-10 12:03:10 | Re: V4 of PITR performance improvement for 8.4 |