Re: GUC variable set, TODO

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GUC variable set, TODO
Date: 2004-04-19 16:02:45
Message-ID: 25798.1082390565@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> Ok. I understand that you suggest to Thomas that he should only touch
> the search array to insert new pointers to guc description structures,
> which may come from outside or be newly allocated, without touching the
> existing static versions for internal guc variables.

Right. IIRC there are some comments about this possibility already in
the source code.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-19 16:46:18 Why are these ARC variables per-backend?
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-04-19 16:01:09 Re: signal 11 on AIX: 7.4.2