Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Is this an appropriate commit for post-Beta?  Does it fix a critical bug 
>> that will prevent a release from happening? :(

> Well, I asked -hackers before committing, and there were no objections,
> plus there were a couple of messages that weren't actual encouragements
> but I took as sign of approval.

Yeah, I would have told him "no" if I thought there were any risk of
breaking things, but renaming some constants seems a pretty safe
activity --- the compiler will catch any overlooked cases.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so at 2005-11-03 17:26:04 from Alvaro Herrera

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2005-11-03 18:02:13
	Subject: Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-11-03 17:53:01
	Subject: Re: Exclusive lock for database rename

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2005-11-03 18:03:23
	Subject: press - pr: Fix broken markup, a couple of typos and set the release
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2005-11-03 17:45:30
	Subject: pgsql: Thinking further, it seems we had better also copy down