From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rename the members of CommandDest enum so |
Date: | 2005-11-03 17:55:37 |
Message-ID: | 25785.1131040537@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> Is this an appropriate commit for post-Beta? Does it fix a critical bug
>> that will prevent a release from happening? :(
> Well, I asked -hackers before committing, and there were no objections,
> plus there were a couple of messages that weren't actual encouragements
> but I took as sign of approval.
Yeah, I would have told him "no" if I thought there were any risk of
breaking things, but renaming some constants seems a pretty safe
activity --- the compiler will catch any overlooked cases.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2005-11-03 18:03:23 | press - pr: Fix broken markup, a couple of typos and set the release |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-03 17:45:30 | pgsql: Thinking further, it seems we had better also copy down |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-11-03 18:02:13 | Re: Reducing the overhead of NUMERIC data |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-11-03 17:53:01 | Re: Exclusive lock for database rename |