From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) |
Date: | 2003-03-10 23:36:27 |
Message-ID: | 25711.1047339387@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> So, what should we do? Should we go another month or two and just wait
> until we have enough must-have features? While not waiting on specific
> features, it _is_ waiting for something to warrant a release. I guess
> the big question is whether we release on a scheduled-basis or a
> enough-features-basis.
"Enough features" is such a judgment call that no one can predict what
the schedule will be, if that's part of the decision.
I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that
without good concrete arguments for doing so.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-03-11 00:12:19 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-10 23:30:44 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2003-03-11 00:12:19 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-10 23:30:44 | Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign |