Tomas Vondra <tv(at)fuzzy(dot)cz> writes:
> Should we change the type of nxacts to int64 (thus allowing '-t' with
> 64-bit integers), or just the overflow in the printf call? I don't find
> it very practical to use -t with values not fitting into 32-bits (the -T
> seems better to do that), so I'm inclined to just fix the printf.
I concur: I don't see people setting -t higher than INT_MAX, but a -t
times -c product exceeding INT_MAX seems more plausible.
> Patch v3 attached.
Looks good, pushed.
regards, tom lane