Re: an idea, language SPI

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: an idea, language SPI
Date: 2009-01-05 20:14:18
Message-ID: 25577.1231186458@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I am thinking about reimplementation PL/pgPSM, where code should be
> shared with PL/pgSQL. I have idea of some middle language, that should
> be used for both languages. This language could be based on SPI
> interface with some procedural elements (if, jmp, return).

You mean exposed to the user? Why would anyone want that? By the time
you had added enough features to it to be usable, you'd have plpgsql
or equivalent.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2009-01-05 20:23:49 Re: Filtering WAL records in recovery
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2009-01-05 20:08:22 Re: Status of issue 4593