Re: window function and order by

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Torsten Förtsch <torsten(dot)foertsch(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: window function and order by
Date: 2013-12-21 00:08:53
Message-ID: 25569.1387584533@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torsten_F=F6rtsch?= <torsten(dot)foertsch(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> select id, buy_price, sum(buy_price) over (order by id) sum
> from fmb
> where 202300<=id and id<=202400
> order by id;

> Do I need the ORDER BY clause at the end? Or does the ORDER BY in the
> window function already define the order of the result set?

According to the standard, you'd need the ORDER BY to guarantee any
particular ordering of the output. However, our implementation will
deliver the rows in the window function's order as long as there's
only one window function order (otherwise you get a more-or-less-
random one of them...). It won't cost anything to have the ORDER BY
though, so I'd recommend keeping it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-12-21 00:12:47 Re: Seems like bug in 9.1.3, need to confirm.
Previous Message AI Rumman 2013-12-20 23:19:52 Seems like bug in 9.1.3, need to confirm.