Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net> writes:
> I think we had this discussion before though, and the "parameterized"
> types, like varchar(256), were not available for extended types, like
> our geometries.
I can't see any way to handle parameterized types without extending the
grammar individually for each one --- otherwise it's too hard to tell
them apart from function calls. That makes it a bit hard to do 'em
as plug-ins :-(. The grammar hacks are certainly ugly though, and if
someone could think of a way, I'm all ears...
regards, tom lane