using SQL for multi-machine job management?

From: jebjeb <martin(dot)belleau(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: using SQL for multi-machine job management?
Date: 2009-09-12 21:05:35
Message-ID: 25418254.post@talk.nabble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice


I'm considering using PostgreSQL as part of the implementation of a
multi-machine job management system. Here is an overview of the system:

-jobs are submitted by an API and stored to a SQL database. Jobs contain a
list of source filenames and a description of the operations to perform on
the files (compress file, add it to an archive, encrypt it, compare with
other file, etc).

-multiple machines (up to 50?) look at the database and grabs a job. It
will update the database to indicate that it will be the machine running
this job. It will also update the database with the current completion
progress (%) of this job.

1)Is this something done often using SQL databases?
2)The jobs will be quite CPU intensive: will I run into trouble if the
database is located on one of the machine which will be executing the jobs?
3)I would like to have a backup ready to take over if the machine with the
database fails. Only some of the info I store (data about a job, machine
that is executing the job) is important to back up. Things like job
progress doesn't have to be backed up. Any tips on how I should set up the
database to accomplish this?

Thanks!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/using-SQL-for-multi-machine-job-management--tp25418254p25418254.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - novice mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message raghu ram 2009-09-13 08:23:01 Invitation to connect on LinkedIn
Previous Message Brian Wolf 2009-09-12 00:12:17 nooby install login security problem