| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: velog + vereport? |
| Date: | 2012-10-12 16:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | 25314.1350057764@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On Friday, October 12, 2012 04:59:39 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>> Meh. I can't get excited about that, but in any case, that looks like
>> it would only justify a varargs version of errmsg(), not the entire
>> ereport infrastructure.
> Yes, that sounds good enough. Are you vetoing that idea (in that case I won't
> pursue it) or just aren't excited about it?
Well, I'm not excited about adding more elog.c infrastructure in advance
of having a use-case in the core code --- how would we know if it got
broken? That's not meant as an absolute veto, but I'm not terribly
comfortable about adding code speculatively.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sébastien Lardière | 2012-10-12 16:03:40 | Re: Truncate if exists |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-10-12 15:58:05 | Re: proposal - assign result of query to psql variable |