| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |
| Date: | 2002-09-19 13:31:14 |
| Message-ID: | 25290.1032442274@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Right, so you have two telling you to remove it, one telling you to add
> it, and two that are discussion why/if it *should* be added ... Tom feels
> it should be added, and I'm clarifing the why of it ... don't re-add it
> until we've determined *if* it is actually an open issue or not ... stop
> jumping the gun ...
It *is* an open issue, Marc: Peter and I think so, at least. You cannot
declare by fiat that it isn't.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2002-09-19 13:47:14 | Re: [GENERAL] PGXLOG variable worthwhile? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-19 13:29:28 | Re: The TODO List (Was: Re: Open 7.3 items) |