Re: problem with large maintenance_work_mem settings and

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problem with large maintenance_work_mem settings and
Date: 2006-03-07 19:08:37
Message-ID: 2525.1141758517@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>> samples % symbol name
>> 24915704 96.2170 ltsReleaseBlock

> We probably need to tweak things so this doesn't get called during the
> "final merge" pass. Looking at it now.

I've committed a fix for this into CVS HEAD --- please try it out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2006-03-07 22:10:44 Re: Coverity Open Source Defect Scan of PostgreSQL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-03-07 17:32:55 Re: current segfault if autovauum is on