| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Chernow" <ac(at)esilo(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |
| Date: | 2008-09-19 20:14:16 |
| Message-ID: | 25233.1221855256@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
"Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Andrew Chernow <ac(at)esilo(dot)com> wrote:
>> BTW, the event system might be an alternative solution for PGNoticeHooks
>> (PGEVT_NOTICE).
> Another possible use of the event hooks -- just spitballing here -- is
> to generate an event when a notification comes through (you would
> still receive events the old way., by command or PQconsumeInput).
Seems rather pointless; you'd just be adding multiple ways to do things
we can do perfectly well now.
> Maybe this would eventually replace the current notification interface
> (wasn't this going to be changed anyways?)
No, I don't think anyone was unhappy with the libpq API for it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2008-09-19 20:28:32 | Re: FSM patch - performance test |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-19 20:08:11 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2008-09-22 00:29:17 | Re: [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2] |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-09-19 20:08:11 | Re: [PATCHES] libpq events patch (with sgml docs) |