Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

From: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date: 2015-10-22 16:15:35
Message-ID: 2503610.GK2PORpHW9@dinodell
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello.
Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full plan. In
this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task parallel query
does not have such a problem?

> This turns out not to be straightforward to code, because we
> don't have a generic plan tree walker,

I have an inner development. I am using python analyzing header files and
generates a universal walker (parser, paths ,executer and etc trees), as well
as the serializer and deserializer to jsonb. Maybe I should publish this code?

Thanks.

--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2015-10-22 16:26:46 Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2015-10-22 16:00:37 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing