Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Date: 2011-02-16 15:26:47
Message-ID: 24996.1297870007@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> BTW, you use the term 'fictitious' in the comments, would it be better
> to standardize the term used for such an index? So either the comment would
> be changed to call it hypothetical, or the structure member would be changed
> to isfictitious.

Yeah, hypothetical is the more-established term I think.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-02-16 15:27:54 Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-16 15:25:08 Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks