Re: Autoconf update?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Autoconf update?
Date: 2005-05-30 18:14:02
Message-ID: 24991.1117476842@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Does anyone object if we moved to Autoconf 2.59? It's been the last
> release for 18 months now, so it seems reasonable to settle on it. I'm
> not actually looking to use features from there, but it gets a bit
> annoying to have to keep so many Autoconf versions around.

Well, it'll still be necessary to keep 2.53 around, unless you want to
move to 2.59 for future releases of the back branches too ... which
might be OK, I'm not sure.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Bernier 2005-05-30 18:42:32 Re: US Goverment and Patents
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-05-30 18:11:01 Re: Fix for cross compilation