Re: Packaging 7.1.1

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Rachit Siamwalla <rachit(at)ensim(dot)com>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Packaging 7.1.1
Date: 2001-05-04 14:36:32
Message-ID: 24899.988986992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org> writes:
> As to why all these files aren't part of the source tree, well, unless
> there was a large cry for it to happen, I don't believe it should.
> PostgreSQL is very platform-agnostic -- and I like that. Including the
> RPM stuff as part of the Official Tarball (TM) would, IMHO, slant that
> agnostic stance in a negative way.

Seems like that stuff should be in CVS somewhere ... if only so someone
else can pick up the ball if you get run over by a truck :-(.

If it's just a small amount of code, I don't see what the harm would be
in including it in the regular distro, though we should talk about just
where it should go. If it's a large amount of code then perhaps a
separate CVS project would be better, so that people who have no use for
it don't end up pulling/downloading it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rocco Altier 2001-05-04 14:41:17 RE: Packaging 7.1.1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-05-04 14:29:50 Re: Re: A bug with pgsql 7.1/jdbc and non-ascii (8-bit) chars?