From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "anarazel(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |
Date: | 2013-03-28 21:38:05 |
Message-ID: | 24824.1364506685@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
"anarazel(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> schrieb:
>> Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work fine.
>> I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.
> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be dropped indexes. No?
No, he doesn't need to look at indisready/indislive; if either of those
flags are off then indisvalid should certainly be off too. (If it
isn't, queries against the table are already in trouble.)
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | anarazel@anarazel.de | 2013-03-28 21:47:55 | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-03-28 21:35:08 | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | anarazel@anarazel.de | 2013-03-28 21:47:55 | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-03-28 21:35:08 | Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump. |