Re: Ignore invalid indexes in pg_dump.

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> schrieb:

>"anarazel(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> schrieb:
>>> Yeah, if you can just ignore !indisvalid indexes that should work
>fine.
>>> I see no need to look at indisready if you're doing that.
>
>> You need to look at inisready in 9.2 since thats used for about to be
>dropped indexes. No?
>
>No, he doesn't need to look at indisready/indislive; if either of those
>flags are off then indisvalid should certainly be off too. (If it
>isn't, queries against the table are already in trouble.)

9.2 represents inisdead as live && !ready, doesn't it? So just looking at indislive will include about to be dropped or partially dropped indexes?

Andres

---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.