| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
| Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: postgresql under Windows is slow |
| Date: | 2002-01-30 17:58:04 |
| Message-ID: | 24787.1012413484@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> writes:
> anybody has an experience how is stable postgresql under Windows system ?
> I tried postgresq 7.1 under Cygwin, Windows 98 and was dissapointed
> by very bad performance. Are there something I could tune ?
> I got 250 sel/sec on simple select from table with 500 rows !
> Under Linux I have 2500 sel/sec.
Never tried it myself, but I distinctly recall someone reporting that
they got comparable performance on Cygwin as on Linux. You might try
asking on pgsql-cygwin.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brian McCane | 2002-01-30 18:00:13 | Re: Listing Triggers |
| Previous Message | Sean Chittenden | 2002-01-30 17:56:36 | Re: INSERT performace. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2002-01-30 18:40:17 | Re: Syscaches should store negative entries, too |
| Previous Message | Naomi Walker | 2002-01-30 17:31:29 | Re: Backup database through web and php |