On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 00:00, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> To make negative cache entries work correctly, we'd have to issue
> cross-backend SI messages for inserts into the system catalogs, not
> only for updates and deletes. This would mean more SI traffic than
> there is now. I think it'd still be a win, but the case for negative
> cache entries isn't quite as airtight as I thought. There could be
> scenarios where the extra SI traffic outweighs the savings from avoiding
> failing catalog searches.
>
> Comments anyone?
The standard one - if not sure, make it an option ;)
------------
Hannu